Speed Is Never Just Speed
What rugby can teach us about leadership
Over the years, I’ve come to believe that speed in business is often misunderstood. We talk about it as if it’s a single dial you can just turn up, move faster, ship quicker, decide sooner. In practice, speed is an outcome, not an instruction. It’s something that emerges when a few underlying forces are working together.
The way I think about it is simple:
Speed = Focus + Collaboration + Transformation + Psychological Safety
When any one of those breaks down, speed doesn’t just slow, it becomes fragile. You might move quickly for a short burst, but it won’t last. Sustainable speed requires all four.
This post isn’t about business, though. At least not directly.
I don’t pretend to be a rugby expert. I didn’t grow up playing the game, I don’t know every rule, and I still find myself not understanding everything that happens during play. But I like watching rugby. There’s something about the sport that feels deeply honest: the physicality, the structure, the way individuality only matters if it fits into a collective system.
The more I watch, the more I see echoes of the same forces that drive high-performing teams in organizations. Rugby, at its best, is a masterclass in focus, collaboration, transformation, and psychological safety, all moving at speed, under pressure, with no room for hesitation.
So this is an outsider’s perspective. Not a technical analysis of rugby, but an exploration of what leadership and teams can learn from a sport that understands something many organizations still struggle with: you don’t play fast by telling people to move faster, you earn speed by building the conditions that allow it.
Let’s start with focus.
Focus
Earning the Right to Go Wide
A phrase you hear a lot in rugby is “earn the right to go wide.” I was introduced to this phrase by a friend of mine who was a good rugby player and now coaches. At a glance, it sounds like a tactical cliché. But the more you watch the game, the more profound it becomes.
Teams don’t start by flinging the ball to the edges and hoping for magic. They go straight first. They take contact. They secure the ball at the breakdown. They force the defense to commit bodies and attention to the middle of the field. Only after doing the hard, unglamorous work do space and speed appear out wide. Width is the reward, not the strategy.
Focus in rugby is ruthless. Everyone knows what matters in that moment: win the collision, protect the ball, reset the line. Nothing else counts until those basics are handled. A team that tries to play expansive rugby without first establishing this focus looks fast for a few phases, and then loses possession.
Organizations fall into the same trap. Leaders talk about moving faster, innovating, or scaling, while skipping the equivalent of winning the ruck. Priorities are fuzzy. Fundamentals are shaky. Teams are asked to “go wide” before they’ve aligned on what truly matters. The result isn’t speed, it’s chaos.
Focus is about narrowing the game. It’s choosing the few things that must be true before anything else can work. In business, that might mean clarity on the customer problem, agreement on success metrics, or discipline around what not to do. Until those are established, every attempt to move faster just increases the risk of dropping the ball.
In rugby, space only opens up once the opposition is forced to respect the middle. In leadership, optionality only appears once focus is earned. Speed isn’t created by ambition alone; it’s unlocked by doing the hard work first.
You don’t start wide. You earn it.
Collaboration
Every Phase Is a Small Act of Trust
If focus is about narrowing the game, collaboration is about making sure you’re never isolated when you do. Rugby makes this painfully obvious. The sport punishes individuals who act alone, no matter how talented they are.
When a player takes the ball into contact, they’re making an implicit bet that support will arrive. They hit the line hard not because they’re reckless, but because they believe teammates will clear the ruck, secure possession, and make the next play possible. Without that trust, players hesitate. And in rugby, hesitation is the slowest thing on the field.
One of the things that stands out most to me as a non-expert is how situational ownership is. There’s no time for debates about responsibility. Whoever is closest does the work. Whoever sees the threat acts. The ruck doesn’t care about job titles. Collaboration in rugby isn’t about coordination meetings; it’s about shared intent and instinctive action.
Modern rugby attacks make this even clearer. Players run lines not knowing if they’ll get the ball, trusting that the pattern will eventually put them in the right place at the right time. Support lines are run in expectation, not reaction. The fastest teams aren’t reacting to breaks; they’re already there when the break happens.
This is where many organizations struggle. We say we value collaboration, but what we often mean is consensus, alignment decks, or endless handoffs. That kind of collaboration feels safe, but it’s slow. Real collaboration looks more like rugby: clear patterns, strong fundamentals, and deep trust that others will do their part without needing to be asked.
Speed emerges when teams stop protecting their own territory and start playing off each other. When people assume support instead of waiting for permission. When ownership flows to the moment, not the org chart.
In rugby, the ball moves fastest when everyone is already in motion.
In organizations, it’s the same.
Transformation
Speed At Scale Isn’t Accidental, It’s Designed
If focus earns you the right to play and collaboration keeps you in the game, transformation is what allows speed to scale. Rugby history is full of talented teams that looked impressive on paper but folded under pressure. What separates the great ones is not raw ability, but how deliberately they evolve.
The 2003 England World Cup team under Sir Clive Woodward is one of the clearest examples of this. Woodward didn’t believe that performance was driven by a single breakthrough idea. He believed it was built through relentless, incremental improvement. His philosophy of “100 things 1% better” wasn’t about slogans; it was about systems. Every detail mattered, from preparation and recovery to decision-making in the final minutes of a match.
What stands out most is how intentionally Woodward engineered behavior under pressure. The introduction of the “Black Book”, also known as the ‘teamship rules’, created consistency in language, expectations, and standards across the squad. Players didn’t have to think about what good looked like; it was already defined. Even more telling was the focus on T-Cup, Thinking Correctly Under Pressure. Training wasn’t just about physical execution; it was about rehearsing decision-making when fatigue, noise, and stakes were at their highest.
That’s transformation. Not radical reinvention for its own sake, but systematic evolution that makes the team more predictable to itself and more dangerous to its opponents.
In organizations, transformation often gets framed as a one-time event: a reorg, a new operating model, a big strategic pivot. But speed doesn’t come from episodic change. It comes from building systems that continuously raise the floor while reducing the cognitive load on teams. When people don’t have to relearn the basics every time conditions change, they move faster.
Woodward’s teams didn’t rely on heroics in the final moments. They relied on preparation so deep that pressure felt familiar. That’s the real payoff of transformation: when the environment changes, the team doesn’t freeze. It adapts.
Psychological Safety
Playing Fast Without Fear
One of the hardest things to appreciate about rugby, especially from the outside, is how much the game depends on people being willing to fail in public. Every carry risks a turnover. Every pass risks a knock-on. Every kick can go wrong in front of tens of thousands of people. Mistakes aren’t an edge case; they’re baked into the game.
What separates fast teams from hesitant ones is how they treat those mistakes.
In rugby, fear shows up as hesitation. Players check their run, second-guess the pass, or take a step sideways instead of committing forward. That half-second of doubt is usually enough for the defense to reset. Speed dies not because of a bad decision, but because someone was afraid to make one.
The best teams operate with a strong “next job” mentality. Errors are acknowledged, but they aren’t litigated in the moment. The expectation is simple: recover, realign, and get back into the system. The culture doesn’t eliminate mistakes; it eliminates the fear of making them. That’s what keeps the game moving.
This is where leadership matters most. Players only play freely when they trust that one mistake won’t cost them their place, their role, or their standing in the team. Coaches who punish errors create conservative play. Coaches who create safety get commitment, speed, and resilience under pressure.
Organizations are no different. Teams slow down when people are afraid to speak up, try something new, or admit they don’t know the answer. The cost isn’t just morale; it’s velocity. When failure is treated as something to hide or punish, decisions get delayed, risks get deferred, and learning grinds to a halt.
Psychological safety doesn’t mean low standards or avoiding hard conversations. Rugby is anything but gentle. It means creating an environment where effort, intent, and learning are protected, even when execution falls short. Accountability still exists, but it’s focused on response and improvement, not blame.
Fast teams, on the field and in business, share one belief: mistakes are part of the game, but fear doesn’t have to be.
When people stop worrying about what happens if they fail, they start moving at full speed.
Conclusion
You Don’t Command Speed, You Create It
Rugby makes one thing uncomfortably clear: speed is never a single attribute. It’s the byproduct of fundamentals done well, together, under pressure. Teams that try to shortcut that reality might look exciting for a few moments, but they don’t last.
The same is true in leadership. If speed is what you’re after, start by examining the conditions you’re creating:
Focus: Have you earned the right to go wide, or are you asking teams to move fast without clarity on what matters most?
Collaboration: Do people instinctively support each other, or do they wait for permission, handoffs, and approval?
Transformation: Are you relying on heroics, or have you designed systems that help people continuously improve?
Psychological Safety: Are mistakes treated as data and feedback, or as something to be feared and hidden?
None of these are slogans. They’re leadership choices, reinforced every day by what you reward, what you tolerate, and what you ignore.
Rugby players don’t speed up because someone on the sideline yells “play faster.” They move quickly because they trust the system, trust each other, and trust that one mistake won’t end their career. That trust allows them to commit fully, and commitment is what creates real speed.
Call to action for leaders:
If your organization feels slow, resist the urge to push harder. Instead, ask where fear, confusion, or friction are quietly applying the brakes. Tighten focus. Strengthen collaboration. Invest in transformation that makes good decisions repeatable. And above all, build an environment where people can act decisively without fear.
Because in rugby, and in business, the fastest teams aren’t the most frantic ones. They’re the ones who’ve earned the right to play fast.




Really insightful, extremely well written 👏
Very good read! Dave Brailsford actually had a very similar approach with Team Sky (cycling) with one key difference: measurement over culture. Cycling is less a team sport of course, so the emphasis on data makes sense there.